Prediction of Daniel Michalski vs Maciej Ziomber Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Michalski vs M. Ziomber

Daniel Michalski
POL
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
25
Age
24
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
-
338
C. Rank
Ret.
243
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Maciej Ziomber
POL
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
25
Age
24
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
-
338
C. Rank
Ret.
243
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Michalski 0 - 0 Ziomber
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Michalski | 0 |
Ziomber | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
D. Michalski vs M. Ziomber H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
62.78% (285-169) | Career Total W/L | 36.36% (4-7) |
15 | Titles | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Michalski vs M. Ziomber Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel Michalski has won 40.76% of points on their second serve, while Maciej Ziomber has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel Michalski, in recent form, has won 42.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maciej Ziomber has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.58% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Daniel Michalski has saved 42.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maciej Ziomber has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel Michalski has won 62.67% of matches played (W/L 47/28), with Maciej Ziomber winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Daniel Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 250/131), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/6). Maciej Ziomber has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 4/7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 4/7).
- Player level: In the last year, Daniel Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.78% of matches (W/L 20/21), where as Maciej Ziomber has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 377.09 while Maciej Ziomber has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel Michalski has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maciej Ziomber has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel Michalski has converted 37.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maciej Ziomber has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Daniel Michalski vs Maciej Ziomber Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Michalski 53%, Ziomber 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Michalski 54%, Ziomber 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Michalski 55%, Ziomber 0%.
D. Michalski Recent Matches Played
M. Ziomber Recent Matches Played

D. Michalski vs M. Ziomber Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62.78% (285/169) | YTD Win/Loss | 36.36% (4/7) |
60.37% (626/411) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.13% (9/14) |
54.08% (5107/4336) | Games Win/Loss | 46.45% (98/113) |
48.39% (30/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
65.62% (250/131) | Clay Win/Loss | 36.36% (4/7) |
45.45% (5/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
629 | Aces Total | 0 |
0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
901 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
1:49:12 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
496.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
61% (18178/29693) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
65% (11781/18178) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
51% (5925/11515) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
48% (1719/3601) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
44% (13331/30057) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.00% (0/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
49.09% (81/84) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
71.99% (203/79) | Futures W/L | 36.36% (4/7) |
63% (281/446) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (4/11) |
67% (65/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
56% (77/137) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
88% (281/246) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (4/4) |
12% (281/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (4/0) |
22% (173/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (7/0) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
11:00 PM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
1.58
W2
2.27
08:30 PM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
2.08
W2
1.69
10:00 AM 10/10/25
PredictionW1
2.22
W2
1.61
11:15 AM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
1.26
W2
3.48
05:30 PM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
3.5
W2
1.27
01:30 PM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
3.04
W2
1.38
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Michalski (M25 Santa Margherita di Pula)
Giunta vs MichalskiCould play in The Final
Piraino vs MichalskiCould play in The Final
Gill vs MichalskiCould play in The Final
Sorger vs MichalskiCould play in The Final
Ovcharenko vs MichalskiCould play in The Semifinals
Handel vs MichalskiCould play in The Semifinals
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
05:00
H2H 7-4
14:00
H2H 1-4
05:00
H2H 1-4
15:30
H2H 0-3
Tennis Events This Week
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai
China
Cali Challenger
Colombia
Fairfield Challenger
United States
Hersonissos 5 Challenger
Greece
Jinan Challenger
China
Roanne Challenger
France
Valencia Challenger
Spain
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Lexington
United States
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Pontevedra
Spain
M15 Rodez
France
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Kigali
Rwanda
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy